On extended, boundless, vibratory and in-the-now sympathy music

http://jeromejoy.org/


  || NEWS                 || BIO   | SHOWS   | CATALOG                 || PROJE(C)TS   | MP3s   | CDs   | VIDEOS                         || BIBLIO   | STUDIES   | DOCUMENTATION   | PH.D.   | EDU                 | COLLECTIVE JUKEBOX   | NOCINEMA.ORG   | CONCERTS FILMS   || AUDITO   | QWAT?                   || home   | contact  |     |    🔎  |

  Last changed - (French time): 2011/01/29 15:07     > Recent changes

 

../files/articles/nocinema/template/2.jpg../files/articles/nocinema/template/3.jpg../files/articles/nocinema/template/5.jpg../files/articles/nocinema/template/6.jpg../files/articles/nocinema/template/10.jpg../files/articles/nocinema/template/12.jpg../files/articles/nocinema/template/13.jpg../files/articles/nocinema/template/15.jpg../files/articles/nocinema/template/1.jpg
« Tout ce qui bouge sur un écran est du cinéma. » (Jean Renoir)


  Sommaire / Contents 





mot-clés :


Wolfgang Staehle, Empire, 1999


Wolfgang Staehle, «Empire 24/7», 1999(Edit)

installation


« Empire 24/7 » - Instant images for instant consumption: In this hommage to Andy Warhol, which originally appeared as a projected environment in the 1999 exhibit «net_condition» in Karlsruhe, Germany, a video camera pointed out of The Thing's New York office window captures a continuous image of Leona Helmsley's prized possession, i.e. the Empire State Building.

24/7 refers to the availability of access usually to a shop, open 24 hours on 7 days a week.


Wolfgang Staehle: Empire 24/7

http://www.thing.net/empire.html (Netscape only)
http://bbs.thing.net

Instructions for viewing: "Empire 24/7" is intended as an installation piece (projector or plasma screen) and NOT as a webcam display in a browser window. It will work nonetheless under some conditions if you want to take a peek. You'll need Netscape, since MS Explorer doesn't interpret server push (unless you find the right plug-in). To receive continuous server push updates, you have to set your cache to 0 (look under preferences/advanced).


photogrammes: page de photogrammes

url: http://www.thing.net/~humbot/empire/

../files/articles/nocinema/staehle/empire1.jpg

../files/articles/nocinema/staehle/empire2.jpg

../files/articles/nocinema/staehle/empire3.jpg

../files/articles/nocinema/staehle/empire4.jpg

../files/articles/nocinema/staehle/empire5.jpg

../files/articles/nocinema/staehle/empire6.png

../files/articles/nocinema/staehle/empire7.png


INTERVIEW (Edit)

by Alessandro Ludivico, neural.it, october 2001

Wolfgang Staehle (Thing.org) interview, the webcam recording the Twin Towers' end.

by Alessandro Ludovico

http://www.neural.it/english/wolfgangstaehle.htm

Your installation in the Postmasters Gallery was an unintentional live witness of the WTC attack. After the shock days, do you see a philosophical or casual reason of this unique coincidence?

No, I don't see any reason for this coincidence. And I am really not that happy that the work is now frequently discussed in the context of this calamity. The intent of the work is quite different, quite the opposite of this sensational media frenzy. But I also realize that there's no escaping this changed context...

Can you remember of any significant picture that wasn't televised? Anyway could any picture be able to better express the sense of what happened?

The major piece in the show at Postmasters was a dual projection of lower Manhattan. I have this view archived for the whole day of September 11, 2001. From 0 hours to 0 hours. A picture every 5 seconds. And I am not giving it to the media.

Reading the international artists' mailing lists the feeling suddenly was of an intimate disorientation, as if anybody were helpless for what happened. What's the feedback you got from The Thing's community?

There was a lot of discussion on thingist as everybody tried to come to grips with what has happened. I was surprised by the wide range of reactions. It certainly was a multi-cultural experience in the best sense of the word. But everybody seems to agree that the world has changed that day. It looks like the 21st century has finally arrived.

Did you recognize any 'aftermath aesthetic' in what was seen on tv and on the web?

I didn't watch much TV or looked at web sites, but I couldn't help noticing that in the galleries, the kind of artwork that's leaning towards the ironic, the trivial, the narcissistic and glamorous, suddenly looked more irrelevant than ever.

What do you think of the memorial projects that started among the web artists' community (as The Digital Video Quilt (http://www.tribute.to), Why Project (http://www.whyproject.org ) or 911 (http://rhizome.org/911 ))?

Nothing... I'm not interested in that kind of work.

Does the imminent war gain a better legitimation from the daily expressed propaganda? Which are the most significant signs used to push on the war propaganda?

There is no legitimation for a war. This should be treated as a criminal and a political problem. These days you can see posters in NY that look like props from a Western movie: "Wanted: Bin Laden, Dead or Alive." Most Americans prefer to live in a bubble reality.

The 'live paradigm' in broadcasting is a space-time shifter; you often deal with in your art works. Is it one of the most important keys to understand contemporary's culture or is it a visual plague that affects our perception of reality?

Both. It's a plague when you loose sight of history and future perspectives. It's valuable when used to make people aware of that fact.

It seems that one of the most powerful emotive consequences of the early TV footage was of plain incredulity (I've read of many people standing on the 5th avenue looking south with portable tvs in their hands). What was the semantic role of the Twin Towers in the Manhattan skyline?

I think of the towers as remnants of the cold war, when America still had to prove the advantages of capitalism. Two big shiny phallus symbols. They must have been attractive targets for these fanatics. In a way, through this disaster, some Americans finally understand that there are a lot of angry people in this world. And a lot of those people are not interested to buy into the American lifestyle franchise - no matter how high the advertising budget. It's a painful realization for many Americans.

October, 2001.






  Sommaire / Contents 










   
   
   
    [Edit] [Hist] [UP] [List] [New]   [Log out]


1995/2020 — Powered by LionWiki 3.1.1 — Thanks to Adam Zivner — webmaster & webdesign : Jérôme Joy — Author : Jérôme Joy — Any material is under copyleft © with in-line & in-text attributions —
http://jeromejoy.org/ — Hosted by nujus.net NYC since 2007, and by The Thing NYC (between 1995-2007 — Thanks to Wolfgang Staehle and the Thing team).